One Man Show
Tue, Jan 8 2013 08:55
| personal, Film, Portfolio, self-production, FCPX, canon 7d, Making Movies With No Budget
| Permalink
One Man Show Teaser from Andrew George on Vimeo.
I've started to play around with a small, solo, personal project regarding writer's block currently titled "One Man Show." I've shared a clip of the project (above) for your viewing pleasure.
The idea is to examine the warped direction one's mind tends to wander through the process of writing. Arguably, short films themed around writer's block are about as free as dialogue free scenes in student films. However, I aim to be honest, dynamic, and attempt to bring the viewer on somewhat of an adventure.
Also, the "solo" aspect of the project is something I've always wanted to try. To set up the camera, lighting, and ultimately direct myself with no input is somewhat agonizing. The production process goes hand in hand with the theme of the piece. All I can promise is the final product will be.... interesting.
Comments
Rethink how you edit... My first "Real" FCP X experience
Sun, Feb 26 2012 04:35
| Final Cut Pro, Film, FCPX, Making Movies With No Budget
| Permalink
![]() |
| It's hard to argue that the interface isn't an upgrade |
Currently, I don't edit, or shoot, on a regular basis. I manage a production department, and have largely been hands off with "work" type projects.
My experience with FCP X, along with the editor in my department has been both frustrating and liberating. Since the 10.0.3 update, I've been reading more and more about FCP X, and I've noticed the prior hate towards "iMovie Pro" has began to wane. People are beginning to realize the potential of the Magnetic Timeline (liberating) and are realizing that Apple doesn't want you to edit the same way you did with the prior Final Cut legacy versions (frustrating).
This past summer, I abandoned a short video project. A fan made music video came out of it, but the original goal also included a short film. We had great footage, but the script was lackluster. However, given enough time, I do believe that a compelling story could emerge through the editing process.
Mentally prepared to revisit the project, I re-opened FCP X, and loaded the footage from the abandoned project into an "Event." With advice I've picked up from the editor in my department, the Apple training, and from reading dozens of articles on FCP X, I'm now approaching this step with a new mind set on the editing process.
If you want a faster, stronger, Final Cut 7, move on to Adobe or Avid. I don't believe Apple wanted to stay in this market.
If you want a new way to edit, a new workflow, and a new way to interact with your clips, you have to start working with FCP X. For any editor or filmmaker feeling as if they're in a creative funk, working on the same type of project with the same old formula, the answer is FCP X.
I'll write more as I continue on with my current project. I recommend to all that you read this article on Philip Bloom's blog, which features 7 professional editors sharing their honest un-bias opinion on editing with FCP X.
If you have any questions about FCP X, comment, shoot me an email, or find me on Facebook.
making movies with a "picture" camera... that can shoot at 4K
Thu, Nov 3 2011 08:38
| Canon, image quality, Film, self-production, canon 7d
| Permalink
DSLR still isn't a household term, reserved only for the nerds of the indie film scene (and scoffed at by the majority of pros... except the director of House)
We use a couple of t3i cameras at work, and I personally use a Canon 7D for my own projects. Every time I shoot, people marvel at the capabilities of what they visually perceive to be a camera meant only for still photography.
Truth be told, myself, and many of my colleagues and peers in the industry would ditch are cameras in a heartbeat for a RED camera, knowing full well the capabilities far surpass our DSLRs.
That's why many of us should be excited today at Canon's announcement of a DSLR that can shoot at 4k.
I can't wait to check the demo videos of this on vimeo.
We use a couple of t3i cameras at work, and I personally use a Canon 7D for my own projects. Every time I shoot, people marvel at the capabilities of what they visually perceive to be a camera meant only for still photography.
Truth be told, myself, and many of my colleagues and peers in the industry would ditch are cameras in a heartbeat for a RED camera, knowing full well the capabilities far surpass our DSLRs.
That's why many of us should be excited today at Canon's announcement of a DSLR that can shoot at 4k.
I can't wait to check the demo videos of this on vimeo.
Blast From the Past! Post #1
Mon, Oct 24 2011 08:21
| Fort Frances, Blast from the past, Film, Portfolio, self-production, Youtube, Making Movies With No Budget
| Permalink
There was a time when mullets were cool. Unfortunately it was short lived.
Sometimes I'm not sure what had more success back in Fort Frances, the attached ode to Fort Frances Ambassador to Fort Frances or the short film it was meant to promote. We uploaded and promoted this on Youtube before the video sharing behemoth was a household name.
I'd like to think this video, and The Show: Loser Pissed, has a place in Fort Frances Folklore, a sentence in the Fort Frances history books. If not, hopefully I'll still come across that odd person in the bars back home, willing to by me a drink for having a little fun highlighting part of the Fort Frances culture.
The Latest FCP X Post!
Fri, May 13 2011 10:06
| Final Cut Pro, Film, Apple, FCPX
| Permalink
I realize I'm missing the boat by about a month in regards to capitalizing on the Final Cut Pro X craze. I resisted the temptation to immediately spill my thoughts on something with so little information provided.
As I follow the super geek world (i.e. twitter and blogs) there's definitely a mixed bag of excitement and concern regarding the new editing suite software. In true Apple fashion, we have been only privileged to a teaser of FCPX. Immediately, freelance videographers balked at the new low price, fearing any adolescent may get his hands on a Macbook, a Canon DSLR, and the new FCPX software, only to call themselves a "professional".
I say, "Bring it on!"
Sometimes we forget that film making, and/or video making is an art as much as it is a profession. Now many have the opportunity to venture into this art that once exceeded the budgets of the middle class. Will there be more crap posted to Vimeo and Youtube? Absolutely! Will incredibly talented individuals emerge from the crap as a result of being able to participate in this form of art? Definitely!
I digress....
What is known about FCPX? (As in "10", not "X", as Apple looks to utilize Roman numerals)
It will be faster - 64 bits, unlimited ram (previous versions only allowed up to 4GB), no rendering (all in the background), and plenty of automation.
It will also cost $299.
There are a lot more features, but the details are extremely vague. Check out this link for more details on what's new at fcp.co.
FCPX... lets talk price. We have to remember that Apple has been packaging a studio in a box for the last 10 years, complete with color correction tools, DVD authoring software, Motion, compression software, Live Type (remember that!), and audio software. Some reports indicate that these sorts of tools will now be integrated directly into FCPX. My guess is that Apple will release these tools through the app store as add-ons, much like what they've done with the iLife suite.
And why not? Many of us elect to utilize other tools rather than the ones bundles within Final Cut Studio. Some use Colorista instead of Color, and Pro Tools instead of Soundtrack Pro. If Apple gives users the opportunity to pick and choose, and not have to pay for the whole batch of software included in the "studio in a box," then we should send a big thank you to Apple for giving us choice, and ultimately a price break.
From the looks of things, the new approach by Apple could be a game-changer. I for one won't be immediately jumping ship to Adobe or Avid. Personally, I'm satisfied with Final Cut 7, and honestly, I'll probably wait for at least a few months until the kinks are worked out of FCPX before I invest, as I usually intend to do when a shiny new piece of software hits the market.
What are your thoughts on FCPX? Leave a comment below, or hit me up on twitter at twitter.com/andrewjoegeorge.
As I follow the super geek world (i.e. twitter and blogs) there's definitely a mixed bag of excitement and concern regarding the new editing suite software. In true Apple fashion, we have been only privileged to a teaser of FCPX. Immediately, freelance videographers balked at the new low price, fearing any adolescent may get his hands on a Macbook, a Canon DSLR, and the new FCPX software, only to call themselves a "professional".
I say, "Bring it on!"
Sometimes we forget that film making, and/or video making is an art as much as it is a profession. Now many have the opportunity to venture into this art that once exceeded the budgets of the middle class. Will there be more crap posted to Vimeo and Youtube? Absolutely! Will incredibly talented individuals emerge from the crap as a result of being able to participate in this form of art? Definitely!
I digress....
What is known about FCPX? (As in "10", not "X", as Apple looks to utilize Roman numerals)
It will be faster - 64 bits, unlimited ram (previous versions only allowed up to 4GB), no rendering (all in the background), and plenty of automation.
It will also cost $299.
There are a lot more features, but the details are extremely vague. Check out this link for more details on what's new at fcp.co.
FCPX... lets talk price. We have to remember that Apple has been packaging a studio in a box for the last 10 years, complete with color correction tools, DVD authoring software, Motion, compression software, Live Type (remember that!), and audio software. Some reports indicate that these sorts of tools will now be integrated directly into FCPX. My guess is that Apple will release these tools through the app store as add-ons, much like what they've done with the iLife suite.
And why not? Many of us elect to utilize other tools rather than the ones bundles within Final Cut Studio. Some use Colorista instead of Color, and Pro Tools instead of Soundtrack Pro. If Apple gives users the opportunity to pick and choose, and not have to pay for the whole batch of software included in the "studio in a box," then we should send a big thank you to Apple for giving us choice, and ultimately a price break.
From the looks of things, the new approach by Apple could be a game-changer. I for one won't be immediately jumping ship to Adobe or Avid. Personally, I'm satisfied with Final Cut 7, and honestly, I'll probably wait for at least a few months until the kinks are worked out of FCPX before I invest, as I usually intend to do when a shiny new piece of software hits the market.
What are your thoughts on FCPX? Leave a comment below, or hit me up on twitter at twitter.com/andrewjoegeorge.

